NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
BILL NUMBER: A8613A
SPONSOR: Ortiz TITLE OF BILL:
An act to amend the vehicle and traffic law and the executive law, in
relation to the field testing of mobile telephones and portable elec-
tronic devices after a motor vehicle accident or collision involving
damage to real or personal property, personal injury or death
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this bill is to increase enforcement of existing prohibi-
tions on the use of mobile telephones and/or personal electronic devices
while driving through the creation of a field test that law enforcement
may conduct at the scene of the accident.
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
Section one provides the legislative intent.
Section two provides that this act shall be known as "Evan's law."
Section three amends section 215 of the vehicle and traffic law, regard-
ing rules and regulations of the Department of Motor Vehicles, by adding
to new subdivisions (d) and (e). Subdivision (d) requires the commis-
sioner, jointly with the commissioner of criminal justice services, to
promulgate rules and regulations necessary to implement provisions of §
1225-e, relating to field testing of mobile telephones and portable
electronic devices. Subdivision (e) requires the commissioner to conduct
a public education campaign relating to the field testing of mobile
telephones and portable electronic devices, and the implied consent to
such testing of any person operating a motor vehicle in the state. The
campaign shall include information pamphlets provided with each applica-
tion for a learner's permit or driver's license, and each renewal there-
of.
Section four amends section 503 of the vehicle and traffic law, regard-
ing the period of validity of drivers' licenses, learners' permits and
applications, to state that if a driver's license is revoked pursuant to
the provisions of section 1225-e of the vehicle and traffic law such
driver must pay a fee of $100 for the issuance of a driver's license.
Section five amends paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section 511 of the
vehicle and traffic law, regarding operation while license or privilege
is suspended or revoked; aggravated unlicensed operation, to add a new
paragraph (v) which states that a person is guilty of aggravated unli-
censed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree when such
person commits the offense of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor
vehicle in the third degree, and the suspension and revocation is based
upon refusal to surrender a mobile telephone or portable electronic
device for field testing pursuant to § 1225-e of this chapter.
Section six amends the vehicle and traffic law by adding a new section
1225-e regarding field testing of mobile telephones and portable elec-
tronic devices. Subdivision 1 defines the following terms:
- Paragraph (a) defines "field testing" to mean the use of an electronic
scanning device to determine whether or not the operator of a motor
vehicle was using a mobile telephone or a portable electronic device in
violation of § 1225-c (use of mobile telephones) or § 1225-d (use of
portable electronic devices) of this article.
Provided that the use of an electronic scanning device will be limited
to determining whether the operator of a motor vehicle was using a
mobile telephone or portable electronic device at or near the time of
the accident or collision which provides the grounds for such testing.
No such electronic scan shall include the content or origin of any
communication, game conducted, image or electronic data viewed on a
mobile telephone or a portable electronic device.
- Paragraph (b) defines "mobile telephone"
- Paragraph (c) defines "portable electronic device"
- Paragraph (d) defines "using"
Subdivision 2 of section six establishes that every person operating a
motor vehicle that has been involved in an accident or collision involv-
ing damage to real or personal property, personal injury or death, and
who has in his or her possession at or near the time of such accident or
collision a mobile telephone or personal electronic device must submit,
at the request of the police officer, his or her mobile telephone or
personal electronic device to the police officer solely for the purpose
of field testing such device.
Paragraph (a) of subdivision 3 of section six establishes that every
person who operates a motor vehicle in the state shall be deemed to have
given consent to field testing of his or her mobile telephone and/or
personal electronic device for the purpose of determining the use there-
of while operating a motor vehicle. Furthermore, paragraph (b) subpara-
graph (1) establishes that refusal to submit a mobile telephone or
personal electronic device to the field testing will result in the revo-
cation of the driver's license or permit. The police officer will inform
the driver that the person's license or permit to drive and any non-re-
sident operating privilege shall be immediately suspended and subse-
quently revoked should the driver refuse to acquiesce to such field
test. Should the driver refuse such field test, the test will not be
conducted and a written report of such refusal will be immediately made
by the police officer before whom the refusal was made. Subparagraph (2)
establishes that the report of the police officer shall set forth the
grounds to believe that the person was in use of his or her mobile tele-
phone or personal electronic device at the time of the accident, that
the person refused the field test and that no field test w as performed.
The report must be transmitted to the commissioner by the police officer
within 48 hours of the refusal. Subparagraph (3) establishes that a
person charged with a violation of § 1225-c or § 1225-d, upon the basis
of such written report, will temporarily have his or her license or
permit suspended by the court without notice pending the determination
of a hearing. Subparagraph (4) states that the court or commissioner
shall provide such person with a scheduled hearing date, a waiver form
and such other information as may be required by the commissioner. Para-
graph (c) establishes that any person whose license or permit to drive
or any non-resident operating privilege has been suspended pursuant to
paragraph (b) of this subdivision is entitled to a hearing. Should the
department fail to provide for such hearing 15 days after the receipt of
a report of refusal, the license or permit shall be reinstated pending a
hearing. Paragraph (d) subparagraph (1) establishes that any license
revoked under this subdivision shall not be restored for at least one
year after such revocation, provided however that where a person has had
a prior license revocation resulting from refusal to surrender to field
testing within five years immediately preceding the date of such revoca-
tion, such license will not be restored for at least eighteen months
after the revocation. Subparagraph (2) of paragraph (d) states that any
person whose license has been revoked pursuant to the provisions of this
section shall also be liable for a civil penalty of $500, except where
the revocation is a second or subsequent revocation within a five year
period the civil penalty shall be $750. Paragraph (f) states that
evidence of a refusal to submit to field testing shall be admissible in
any trial, proceeding or hearing but only upon a showing that the person
was given sufficient warning, in clear and unequivocal language of the
effect of such refusal, and the person persisted in the refusal. Para-
graph (g) states that upon request the person who surrendered his or her
mobile telephone and/or personal electronic device for field testing the
results shall be made available to such person.
Subdivision 4 of section six states that no person may refuse a field
test when a court order for such testing has been issued, and details
the proper procedures for an application for a court order to compel
surrender of a mobile telephone and/or portable electronic device solely
for the purpose of field testing.
Section seven amends section 837 of the executive law, regarding the
functions, powers and duties of the division of criminal justice
services, to add a new subdivision 21 to empower the commissioner to
promulgate rules and regulations necessary to implement the provisions
of § 1225-e of the vehicle and traffic law.
Section eight establishes the effective date.
JUSTIFICATION:
Evan Lieberman was a nineteen-year-old college freshman when he was
tragically killed in a motor vehicle accident caused by a distracted
driver. The cause of the accident however, was only discovered after
Evan's family subpoenaed the driver's cell phone records, since police
rarely examine mobile devices following an accident. In this case, the
phone was not even removed from the car, leaving essential evidence
sitting in a junk yard for weeks following his death. Evan's tragic
story sheds much needed light on the inability of law enforcement to
adequately enforce the 2001 ban placed on handheld mobile device use
while driving.
Distracted driving is the leading cause of accidents among young driv-
ers, and has led to a significant increase in overall accidents among
drivers of all ages. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
reported that every day in this country nine people are killed, and more
than 1,153 are injured, in accidents involving a distracted driver. This
roughly equates to one in five accidents per year caused by distracted
driving, and the problem only continues to escalate. The cost associated
with distracted driving is astronomical. The National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration estimates that crashes caused by distracted driv-
ing cost the United States approximately $175 billion per year, this is
roughly $148 per every American. With sixty-seven percent of drivers
reportedly still using their cell phones despite knowledge of the risk
to themselves and other drivers, it is imperative that we tackle this
issue before it claims more innocent lives.
This bill provides law enforcement with a long overdue mechanism to
evaluate cell phone use at the scene of an accident. It authorizes the
use of available technology, which directly connects to the mobile
device to determine whether it was in use at the time of the accident or
immediately prior to its occurrence. This bill embodies the type of
legislation called for by Justice Alito in the recent Supreme Court
case, Riley v. California, where the court held that a warrant is
required to search the contents of a cell phone incident to an arrest.
In his concurring opinion, Justice Alito stated that Congress or state
legislatures may "after assessing the legitimate needs of law enforce-
ment and the privacy interests of cell phone owners, enact legislation
that draws reasonable distinctions based on categories of information or
perhaps other variables." This bill accomplishes just that. The equip-
ment only has the capacity to determine whether the phone was in use at
the time of the accident, and will not invade personal privacy by evalu-
ating the personal content contained on the device.
Countless authorities have found that distracted driving is as danger-
ous, if not more so than driving while intoxicated. However, there is a
great disparity in how these offenses are handled and punished under the
law. It is for the safety and welfare of every New York resident to
establish parity between these two offenses, and change the public
perception around cell phone use while driving. Only by passing Evan's
law can we hope to end the senseless loss of life that continues to
plague our nation.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
New bill
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately, except that sections three, four
and five of this act shall take effect two years after this act shall
have become a law.
STATE OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________________________________
8613--A
2015-2016 Regular Sessions
IN ASSEMBLY
December 16, 2015
___________
Introduced by M. of A. ORTIZ -- read once and referred to the Committee
on Transportation -- recommitted to the Committee on Transportation in
accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill
amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said commit-
tee
AN ACT to amend the vehicle and traffic law and the executive law, in
relation to the field testing of mobile telephones and portable elec-
tronic devices after a motor vehicle accident or collision involving
damage to real or personal property, personal injury or death
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-bly, do enact as follows:
1 Section 1. Legislative intent. The legislature hereby finds that the
2 use of mobile telephones and/or personal electronic devices has dras-
3 tically increased the prevalence of distracted driving. This destructive
4 behavior endangers the lives of every driver and passenger traveling on
5 New York state roadways. In 2001, this legislature enacted legislation
6 prohibiting the use of mobile telephones while driving, and in 2009
7 updated the law to include all portable electronic devices. The execu-
8 tive branch initiated a public campaign against cell phone use while
9 driving, and has even established "text stops" along all major highways.
10 While these efforts have brought much needed attention to the dangers of
11 distracted driving, reports indicate that 67 percent of drivers admit to
12 continued use of their cell phones while driving despite knowledge of
13 the inherent danger to themselves and others on the road. A 10 year
14 trend of declining collisions and casualties was reversed this year as
15 crashes are up 14 percent, and fatalities increased 8 percent, suggest-
16 ing that the problem has not only gotten worse, but is still greatly
17 misunderstood.
18 Furthermore, law enforcement has a difficult time enforcing these
19 public safety laws, especially after an accident where it is impossible
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[] is old law to be omitted.
LBD13105-08-6
A. 8613--A 2
1 to discern whether the operator of a motor vehicle was in fact using his
2 or her cell phone immediately prior to or at the time of the collision.
3 Empowering our law enforcement with technology, which is able to imme-
4 diately determine cell phone usage without an inquiry into the content,
5 will allow enforcement of these laws after an accident while still
6 protecting essential privacy rights. Therefore, the legislature finds
7 that while technology has created this grave danger, it also has the
8 capacity to aid law enforcement in tackling and eradicating distracted
9 driving caused by mobile telephones and personal electronic devices.
10 The legislature further finds that a driver's license is a privilege
11 granted by the state, and maintaining such privilege requires continued
12 compliance with established conditions enumerated in law. One such
13 condition is implied consent, an accepted mechanism in combating driving
14 while under the influence of alcohol. Studies have concluded that text-
15 ing while driving impairs a driver to the level of .08 blood alcohol
16 level. Therefore, it is in the state's interest to treat this impairment
17 with a similar methodology to that of drunk driving. The state's
18 invested interest in promoting public safety and preventing senseless
19 loss of life justifies the creation of Evan's law.
20 § 2. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as "Evan's
21 law".
22 § 3. Section 215 of the vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding
23 two new subdivisions (d) and (e) to read as follows:
24 (d) The commissioner shall, jointly with the commissioner of criminal
25 justice services, promulgate rules and regulations, and take any other
26 action necessary to implement the provisions of section twelve hundred
27 twenty-five-e of this chapter, relating to field testing of mobile tele-
28 phones and portable electronic devices. Such actions shall include the
29 testing and determination of the reliability and accuracy of electronic
30 scanning devices used for such field testing. The commissioner and
31 commissioner of criminal justice services shall approve electronic scan-
32 ning devices which are reliable and accurate for the purpose of conduct-
33 ing field testing.
34 (e) The commissioner shall conduct a public education campaign relat-
35 ing to the field testing of mobile telephones and portable electronic
36 devices, and the implied consent to such testing of any person operating
37 a motor vehicle in this state. Such campaign shall include information
38 pamphlets provided with each application for a learner's permit or driv-
39 er's license, and each renewal thereof.
40 § 4. Paragraph (h) of subdivision 2 of section 503 of the vehicle and
41 traffic law, as amended by section 1 of part PP of chapter 59 of the
42 laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows:
43 (h) An applicant whose driver's license has been revoked pursuant to
44 (i) section five hundred ten of this title, (ii) section eleven hundred
45 ninety-three of this chapter, [and] (iii) section eleven hundred nine-
46 ty-four of this chapter, and (iv) section twelve hundred twenty-five-e
47 of this chapter, shall, upon application for issuance of a driver's
48 license, pay to the commissioner a fee of one hundred dollars. When the
49 basis for the revocation is a finding of driving after having consumed
50 alcohol pursuant to the provisions of section eleven hundred
51 ninety-two-a of this chapter, the fee to be paid to the commissioner
52 shall be one hundred dollars. Such fee is not refundable and shall not
53 be returned to the applicant regardless of the action the commissioner
54 may take on such person's application for reinstatement of such driving
55 license. Such fee shall be in addition to any other fees presently
56 levied but shall not apply to an applicant whose driver's license was
A. 8613--A 3
1 revoked for failure to pass a reexamination or to an applicant who has
2 been issued a conditional or restricted use license under the provisions
3 of article twenty-one-A or thirty-one of this chapter.
4 § 5. Subparagraph (iv) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section
5 511 of the vehicle and traffic law, as amended by chapter 607 of the
6 laws of 1993, is amended and a new paragraph (v) is added to read as
7 follows:
8 (iv) such person has in effect three or more suspensions, imposed on
9 at least three separate dates, for failure to answer, appear or pay a
10 fine, pursuant to subdivision three of section two hundred twenty-six or
11 subdivision four-a of section five hundred ten of this chapter[.]; or
12 (v) the suspension or revocation is based upon refusal to surrender a
13 mobile telephone or portable electronic device for field testing pursu-
14 ant to section twelve hundred twenty-five-e of this chapter.
15 § 6. The vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding a new section
16 1225-e to read as follows:
17 § 1225-e. Field testing of mobile telephones and portable electronic
18 devices. 1. For the purposes of this section, the following terms shall
19 have the following meanings:
20 (a) "Field testing" shall mean the use of an electronic scanning
21 device, approved and utilized in accordance with rules jointly promul-
22 gated by the commissioner and the commissioner of criminal justice
23 services, to determine whether or not the operator of a motor vehicle
24 was using a mobile telephone or a portable electronic device in
25 violation of section twelve hundred twenty-five-c or twelve hundred
26 twenty-five-d of this article. Provided, that such use of an electronic
27 scanning device shall be limited to determining whether the operator of
28 a motor vehicle was using a mobile telephone or portable electronic
29 device in violation of either such section at or near the time of the
30 accident or collision which provides the grounds for such testing.
31 Furthermore, no such electronic scan shall include the content or origin
32 of any communication or game conducted, or image or electronic data
33 viewed, on a mobile telephone or portable electronic device.
34 (b) "Mobile telephone" shall mean a mobile telephone as defined in
35 paragraph (a) of subdivision one for section twelve hundred
36 twenty-five-c of this article.
37 (c) "Portable electronic device" shall mean a portable electronic
38 device as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision two of section twelve
39 hundred twenty-five-d of this article.
40 (d) "Using" shall mean:
41 (1) for the purposes of mobile telephones, using as defined in para-
42 graph (c) of subdivision one of section twelve hundred twenty-five-c of
43 this article; and
44 (2) for the purposes of portable electronic devices, using as defined
45 in paragraph (b) of subdivision two of section twelve hundred twenty-
46 five-d of this article.
47 2. Every person operating a motor vehicle which has been involved in
48 an accident or collision involving damage to real or personal property,
49 personal injury or death, and who has in his possession at or near the
50 time of such accident or collision, a mobile telephone or personal elec-
51 tronic device, shall at the request of a police officer, surrender his
52 or her mobile telephone and/or portable electronic device to the police
53 officer solely for the purpose of field testing such mobile telephone
54 and/or portable electronic device. If such field testing determines
55 that the operator of the motor vehicle was using his or her mobile tele-
56 phone or portable electronic device in violation of section twelve
A. 8613--A 4
1 hundred twenty-five-c or twelve hundred twenty-five-d of this article,
2 the results of such testing shall constitute evidence of any such
3 violation.
4 3. (a) Any person who operates a motor vehicle in this state shall be
5 deemed to have given consent to field testing of his or her mobile tele-
6 phone and/or portable electronic device for the purpose of determining
7 the use thereof while operating a motor vehicle provided that such test-
8 ing is conducted by or at the direction of a police officer, after such
9 person has operated a motor vehicle involved in an accident or collision
10 involving damage to real or personal property, personal injury or death.
11 (b)(1) If a person operating a motor vehicle involved in an accident
12 or collision involving damage to real or personal property, personal
13 injury or death has in his or her possession a mobile telephone or port-
14 able electronic device, having thereafter been requested to surrender
15 such mobile telephone and/or portable electronic device for field test-
16 ing, and having been informed that the person's license or permit to
17 drive and any non-resident operating privilege shall be immediately
18 suspended and subsequently revoked, shall be revoked for refusal to
19 surrender his or her mobile telephone and/or portable electronic device
20 solely for the purpose of field testing, whether or not the person is
21 found guilty of a violation of section twelve hundred twenty-five-c or
22 twelve hundred twenty-five-d of this article, refuses to surrender his
23 or her mobile telephone or portable electronic device solely for the
24 purpose of field testing, unless a court order has been granted pursuant
25 to subdivision four of this section, field testing shall not be
26 conducted and a written report of such refusal shall be immediately made
27 by the police officer before whom such refusal was made. Such report may
28 be verified by having the report sworn to, or by affixing to such report
29 a form notice that false statements made therein are punishable as a
30 class A misdemeanor pursuant to section 210.45 of the penal law and such
31 form notice together with the subscription of the deponent shall consti-
32 tute a verification of the report.
33 (2) The report of the police officer shall set forth the grounds to
34 believe that the person operated a motor vehicle involved in an accident
35 or collision involving damage to real or personal property, personal
36 injury or death while in possession of a mobile telephone or portable
37 electronic device, that said person had refused to surrender his or her
38 mobile telephone or portable electronic device for field testing, and
39 that no field test was administered. The report shall be transmitted to
40 the commissioner by the police officer within forty-eight hours of the
41 refusal.
42 (3) For persons charged with a violation of section twelve hundred
43 twenty-five-c or twelve hundred twenty-five-d of this article, the
44 license or permit to drive and any non-resident operating privilege
45 shall, upon the basis of such written report, be temporarily suspended
46 by the court without notice pending the determination of a hearing as
47 provided in paragraph (c) of this subdivision. Copies of such report
48 must be transmitted by the court to the commissioner and such transmit-
49 tal may not be waived even with the consent of all the parties. Such
50 report shall be forwarded to the commissioner within forty-eight hours
51 of such filing of charges.
52 (4) The court or the commissioner shall provide such person with a
53 scheduled hearing date, a waiver form and such other information as may
54 be required by the commissioner. If a hearing, as provided in paragraph
55 (c) of this subdivision, is waived by such person, the commissioner
56 shall immediately revoke the license, permit or non-resident operating
A. 8613--A 5
1 privilege, as of the date of receipt of such waiver in accordance with
2 paragraph (d) of this subdivision.
3 (c) Any person whose license or permit to drive or any non-resident
4 operating privilege has been suspended pursuant to paragraph (b) of this
5 subdivision is entitled to a hearing in accordance with a hearing sched-
6 ule to be promulgated by the commissioner. If the department fails to
7 provide for such hearing fifteen days after the receipt of a report of a
8 refusal, the license, permit to drive or non-resident operating privi-
9 lege of such person shall be reinstated pending a hearing pursuant to
10 this section. The hearing shall be limited to the following issues: (1)
11 did such person operate a motor vehicle involved in an accident or
12 collision involving damage to real or personal property, personal injury
13 or death; (2) did such person possess a mobile telephone or portable
14 electronic device at or near the time of such accident or collision; (3)
15 was such person given sufficient warning, in clear or unequivocal
16 language, prior to such refusal that such refusal to surrender his or
17 her mobile telephone and/or portable electronic device for filed testing
18 would result in the immediate suspension and subsequent revocation of
19 such person's license or operating privilege; and (4) did such person
20 refuse to surrender his or her mobile telephone and/or portable elec-
21 tronic device solely for the purpose of field testing. If, after such
22 hearing, the hearing officer, acting on behalf of the commissioner,
23 finds on any one of such issues in the negative, the hearing officer
24 shall immediately terminate any suspension arising from such refusal.
25 If, after such hearing, the hearing officer, acting on behalf of the
26 commissioner finds all of the issues in the affirmative, such officer
27 shall immediately revoke the license or permit to drive or any non-resi-
28 dent operating privilege in accordance with paragraph (d) of this subdi-
29 vision. A person who has had a license or permit to drive or non-resi-
30 dent operating privilege suspended or revoked pursuant to this
31 subdivision may appeal the findings of the hearing officer in accordance
32 with article three-A of this chapter. Any person may waive the right to
33 a hearing under this section. Failure by such person to appear for the
34 scheduled hearing shall constitute a waiver of such hearing; provided,
35 however, that such person may petition the commissioner for a new hear-
36 ing which shall be held as soon as practicable.
37 (d) (1) Any license which has been revoked pursuant to paragraph (c)
38 of this subdivision shall not be restored for at least one year after
39 such revocation, nor thereafter, except in the discretion of the commis-
40 sioner. However, no such license shall be restored for at least eighteen
41 months after such revocation, nor thereafter except in the discretion of
42 the commissioner, in any case where the person has had a prior revoca-
43 tion resulting from refusal to surrender his or her mobile telephone or
44 portable electronic device for field testing within five years imme-
45 diately preceding the date of such revocation.
46 (2) Except as otherwise provided, any person whose license, permit to
47 drive or any non-resident operating privilege is revoked pursuant to the
48 provisions of this section shall also be liable for a civil penalty in
49 the amount of five hundred dollars, except that if such revocation is a
50 second or subsequent revocation pursuant to this section issued within a
51 five year period, the civil penalty shall be in the amount of seven
52 hundred fifty dollars. No new driver's license or permit shall be
53 issued, or non-resident operating privilege restored to such person
54 unless such penalty has been paid. All penalties collected by the
55 department pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be the prop-
A. 8613--A 6
1 erty of the state and shall be paid into the general fund of the state
2 treasury.
3 (e) The commissioner shall promulgate such rules and regulations as
4 may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of this section.
5 (f) Evidence of a refusal to surrender a mobile telephone or portable
6 electronic device for field testing shall be admissible in any trial,
7 proceeding or hearing based on a violation of the provisions of section
8 twelve hundred twenty-five-c or twelve hundred twenty-five-d of this
9 article but only upon a showing that the person was given sufficient
10 warning, in clear and unequivocal language, of the effect of such
11 refusal and that the person persisted in the refusal.
12 (g) Upon the request of the person who surrendered his or her mobile
13 telephone and/or portable electronic device for field testing the
14 results of such testing shall be made available to such person.
15 4. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision three of this
16 section, no person who operates a motor vehicle in this state while
17 possessing a mobile telephone or portable electronic device may refuse
18 to surrender such mobile telephone or portable electronic device solely
19 for the purpose of field testing when a court order for such testing has
20 been issued in accordance with the provisions of this subdivision.
21 (b) Upon refusal by any person to surrender his or her mobile tele-
22 phone and/or portable electronic device for the purpose of field test-
23 ing, the testing shall not be conducted unless a police officer or a
24 district attorney, as defined in subdivision thirty-two of section 1.20
25 of the criminal procedure law, requests and obtains a court order to
26 compel a person to surrender his or her mobile telephone or portable
27 electronic device for field testing upon proof that such person was the
28 operator of a motor vehicle and in the course of such operation, he or
29 she caused serious physical injury, as defined in subdivision ten of
30 section 10.00 of the penal law, to or the death of another person.
31 (c)(1) An application for a court order to compel surrender of a
32 mobile telephone or portable electronic device for field testing, may be
33 made to any supreme court justice, county court judge or district court
34 judge in the judicial district in which the incident occurred, or if the
35 incident occurred in the city of New York before any supreme court
36 justice or judge of the criminal court of the city of New York. Such
37 application may be communicated by telephone, radio or other means of
38 electronic communication, or in person.
39 (2) The applicant must provide identification by name and title, and
40 must state the purpose of the communication. Upon being advised that an
41 application for a court order to compel surrender of a mobile telephone
42 and/or portable electronic device solely for the purpose of field test-
43 ing is being made, the court shall place under oath the applicant and
44 any other person providing information in support of the application as
45 provided in subparagraph three of this paragraph. After being sworn the
46 applicant must state that the person from whom the surrender of a mobile
47 telephone or portable electronic device was requested was the operator
48 of a motor vehicle and in the course of such operation, he or she caused
49 serious physical injury to or the death of another person, and such
50 person refused to surrender his or her mobile telephone or portable
51 electronic device for field testing. The applicant must make specific
52 allegations of fact to support such statement. Any person properly iden-
53 tified, may present sworn allegations of fact in support of the appli-
54 cant's statement.
55 (3) Upon being advised that an oral application for a court order to
56 compel a person to surrender his or her mobile telephone or portable
A. 8613--A 7
1 electronic device for field testing is being made, a judge or justice
2 shall place under oath the applicant and any other person providing
3 information in support of the application. Such oath or oaths and all of
4 the remaining communication must be recorded, either by means of a voice
5 recording device or a stenographic record made, the judge must have the
6 record transcribed, certify to the accuracy of the transcription and
7 file the original record and transcription with the court within seven-
8 ty-two hours of the issuance of the court order. If the longhand notes
9 are taken, the judge shall subscribe a copy and file it with the court
10 within twenty-four hours of the issuance of the order.
11 (4) If the court is satisfied that the requirements for the issuance
12 of a court order pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this
13 subdivision have been met, it may grant the application and issue an
14 order requiring the person to surrender his or her mobile telephone or
15 portable electronic device for the purpose of field testing. When a
16 judge or justice determines to issue an order to compel surrender of a
17 mobile telephone or portable electronic device for the purpose of field
18 testing based on an oral application, the applicant therefor shall
19 prepare the order in accordance with the instructions of the judge or
20 justice. In all cases the order shall include the name of the issuing
21 judge or justice, the name of the applicant, and the date and time it
22 was issued. It must be signed by the judge or justice if issued in
23 person, or by the applicant if issued orally.
24 (5) Any false statement by an applicant or any other person in support
25 of an application for a court order shall subject such person to the
26 offenses for perjury set forth in article two hundred ten of the penal
27 law.
28 (6) The chief administrator of the courts shall establish a schedule
29 to provide that a sufficient number of judges or justices will be avail-
30 able in each judicial district to hear oral applications for court
31 orders as permitted by this section.
32 § 7. Section 837 of the executive law is amended by adding a new
33 subdivision 21 to read as follows:
34 21. Acting by and through the commissioner, to, jointly with the
35 commissioner of motor vehicles, promulgate rules and regulations, and
36 take any other action necessary to implement the provisions of section
37 twelve hundred twenty-five-e of the vehicle and traffic law, relating to
38 field testing of mobile telephones and portable electronic devices. Such
39 actions shall include the testing and determination of the reliability
40 and accuracy of electronic scanning devices used for such field testing.
41 The commissioner and commissioner of motor vehicles shall approve elec-
42 tronic scanning devices which are reliable and accurate for the purpose
43 of conducting field testing.
44 § 8. This act shall take effect immediately, except that sections
45 four, five and six of this act shall take effect two years after this
46 act shall have become a law.
